Kiko Casilla eight-game Leeds punishment explained by FA after racism ban

The FA has released a statement justifying their decision to ban Leeds goalkeeper Kiko Casilla over racist abuse that occurred in September 2019.

They say their intention was to give the player a ten-match ban but an Independent Regulatory Commission felt the punishment was to harsh and suggested an eight-game ban instead.

The Spanish shot stopper learned of the news the day before Leeds won 4-0 against Hull at the KCOM Stadium at the weekend.

It related to racist comments aimed at Charlton's Jonathan Leko which earned Casilla an eight-match ban and a £60,000 fine.

And this evening the FA have published a statement to go with the 62-page document that detailed their findings.

  • Leeds boss Marcelo Bielsa drops Tyler Roberts selection hint after Hull brace

  • Marcelo Bielsa told rivals are looking to get £35m-rated Kalvin Phillips ‘out of Leeds’

It read: “The FA has today published the written reasons in relation to the announcement on Friday 28 March , which confirmed that Leeds United FC’s goalkeeper, Kiko Casilla, was suspended for eight matches, fined £60,000 and is required to attend face-to-face education after a breach of FA Rule E3(2) was found proven by an independent Regulatory Commission.

“In addition, The FA wishes to provide clarity regarding the standard of proof used in its disciplinary proceedings, which is the civil standard. This means that cases will only be proven if the tribunal in question is satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the event in question occurred.

“This civil standard of proof is widely used in civil and regulatory forums, including the Civil Courts, Family Courts and professional regulatory bodies, such as the General Medical Council. It is also used by other Sports Governing Bodies. As such, it is applied industry wide and is the most appropriate standard for the tribunal-based forum in which FA cases are determined.

“As in this case, independent Regulatory Commissions will look for particularly compelling evidence before finding a serious allegation proven. In that regard, paragraphs 20-24 of the written reasons show that the independent Regulatory Commission considered and applied all the relevant case law in respect of the standard to be applied.

“While this matter was therefore appropriately decided to the civil standard, it is important to note that the QC led independent Regulatory Commission stated it was satisfied of the evidence in excess of the balance of probabilities when it said in paragraph 102 of the written reasons that:

‘… we were satisfied to the requisite standard [the balance of probabilities] – and in reality, to a degree well above the requisite standard’

Read More

Today's top football stories on Daily Star

  • Messi voices disapproval at Barca boss
  • Arteta gives Torreira injury update
  • Ben Foster has Watford fans in tears
  • Arsenal fans slam Jenas

“As is clear from the written reasons, the independent Regulatory Commission gave the evidence in this serious matter very close scrutiny. Following this thorough “process, the independent Regulatory Commission came to the unanimous decision that Mr Casilla had racially abused a fellow player on the field of play.

“The FA would like to express its thanks to the witnesses in this case for their assistance, professionalism and full co-operation throughout the process.

“The FA would also like to reiterate its firm and unwavering commitment to tackling all forms of discrimination at every level of the game and encourages any participant or spectator who believes that they have been the subject of, or witness to, discriminatory abuse to report it through the respective appropriate channel: the match referee; CFA network; The FA or its partners at Kick It Out.”

Source: Read Full Article